Monday, June 02, 2014

Sanghi Scissorhands: coming soon to a publishing house close to you

Anita Joseph in The Hindu on the latest casualty of Sanghi censorship

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/another-publisher-forced-to-censor-textbooks/article6075864.ece?homepage=true

The pre-release assessment was ordered after SBAS convener Dinanath Batra served a notice on Orient Blackswan

Another case filed by the Shiksha Bachao Andolan Samiti (SBAS) against a textbook published a decade ago has resulted in Orient Blackswan (OBS) — a publisher specialising in academic books — undertaking a pre-release assessment of books that might attract similar reaction.
One such book, Megha Kumar’s Communalism and Sexual Violence: Ahmedabad since 1969, was withheld from release after it was put on sale. The publishers had announced the book on their website under the segment “New Books and Events” in March along with several other books which continue to be available.
As per a communication sent by OBS to Ms. Kumar, a Rhodes scholar from Oxford University, the board of directors was advised by its legal counsel to undertake a pre-release assessment of books that could run foul of the law. She was also informed that her book would not be released until a “comprehensive assessment has been made and advice obtained.”
Citing concern for the security of authors, staff and their families, OBS said the assessment would include examining the possibility of legal proceedings, especially under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), being filed against them and the company. Explaining OBS position, Mimi Choudhury told The Hinduthat in light of the notice, several books including published works, have been sent for review.
The pre-release assessment was ordered after SBAS convener Dinanath Batra served a notice on OBS for the textbook, Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India. Written by Sekhar Bandopadhyay, a history professor at the Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, the book, according to an article in the RSS mouthpiece Organiser, spread canards against the Sangh.
Waltraud Ernst, one of the four editors of the series ‘Critical Thinking in South Asian History’, under which Ms. Kumar’s book was published, wrote to the publisher: “I find it very difficult indeed to fathom the severity of what is going on here in regard to what seems to me to be politically motivated interference with academic freedom. I would be most grateful for reassurance that all this has been a mistake.”
When contacted, Prof. Ernst, an adjunct professor at St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, and Prof. Bandyopadhy, who is also a series editor, told The Hindu that under the circumstances it was understandable why the publishers resorted to such action. “What is to be done when the IPC becomes relevant to the way professional history is written?’’ said Prof. Ernst.
Earlier, Penguin India had withdrawn American Indologist Wendy Doniger’s book, The Hindus: An Alternative History, from India as part of an out-of-court settlement with SBAS. And, Aleph Book Company decided to reprint her book, On Hinduism, only after objections raised by SBAS were examined by lawyers, independent writers and scholars.
In both cases, the British-vintage 295-A of the IPC was invoked by SBAS.

Wednesday, May 01, 2013

'The universe is then one, infinite, immobile.... It is not capable of comprehension and therefore is endless and limitless, and to that extent infinite and indeterminable, and consequently immobile.'
 Giordano Bruno (1548-1600)

For more on Bruno, see Frances Yates, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. Quite a bit of the book can be found at Googlebooks.

Also see Frances Yates, 'The Religious Policy of Giordano Bruno', [http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/750273.pdf?acceptTC=true ]

Sunday, December 02, 2012

Show your support for a Free and Open Internet


    Some world governments want to increase censorship and regulate the internet. The decisions will be taken in a closed door meeting. Join together and keep the Internet free from government regulated censorship. Visit this link for more info.

Monday, October 08, 2012

Prajapati Obscenity Trial (Supreme Court Verdict)

Lady Chatterley's Lover in Japan

http://www.courts.go.jp/english/judgments/text/1957.03.13-1953-A-No.1713-112004.html

This is the judgement on the case of translation and publication of LADY CHATTERLEY'S LOVER in Japan. In 1950, the editor Kyujiro Koyama and the translator Sei Ito were accused of obscenity for the translation, publication and distribution of this novel. The prosecutor insisted that twelve passages in the book were obscene to the general public and therefore its public viewing constituted a crime under Article 175 of the Penal Code. On the other hand, the accused maintained that the interpretation of the Penal Code given by the prosecutor was flawed and unconstitutional. After a series of disputes at the Tokyo High Court, the case was finally taken to the Supreme Court in 1957. On 13 March of that year, the Supreme Court rejected any appeals made by the accused and backed the accusations made by the prosecution that the twelve passages at issue infected the whole book with obscenity arguing that "the description of the sex acts contained therein at twelve passages, as pointed out by the prosecutor, is all too bold, detailed, and realistic"

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Book on War-crime likely to be banned in Pakistan

The book "A Stranger in my own Country East Pakistan, 1969-1971" written by Late Major General Khadim Hussain Raja and published by OUP, Pakistan has caused an uproar in the Pakistan government. The book has reportedly brought to light the war-crimes and genocides performed by the Pakistan army under the command of General A.A.K Niazi during the Bangladesh Liberation War.
The book was published according to the last wishes of the author expressed to his family as he feared that publication of the book during his lifetime may put his life at risk.
Reports indicate that Pakistan government is trying everything it can to ban the book in the country. The book hasn't made its way into Indian markets yet and doesn't looks like it will.
I don't know whether we will get to see another government "sponsored" book-burning in this 21st century but we should try to get hold of a copy, if possible, before the last wishes of the author gets wiped out from the face of the earth.
Useful link:http://www.oup.com.pk/shopexd.asp?id=2265


Tuesday, July 10, 2012

The Obama "Joker" Poster

Firas Alkhateeb, an American citizen of Palestinian origin designed and uploaded the Obama "joker" poster on Flickr in January 2009. Described by 'The Guardian' as "America's first successful use of street art", the poster has been a symbol for anti-Obama protests. Following media coverage, Flickr deleted all the available digital posters and the forums discussing it. This action was met by severe backlash which caused Flickr to change their Copyright Infringement Policy. As a result of Flickr removing the image, some online communities viewed Alkhateeb as the most visible representative of free speech on the internet in August 2009.
Details of the poster controversy are available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_%22Joker%22_poster.

Sunday, July 08, 2012

Class groups for assignments

Group 1
Bidisha UG3
Utsarjana UG3
Anwesha RayUG2
Subhajit DasUG2
BhagyasreeUG2
ShourjoUG2
 IshitaUG2

Group 2
Aratrika UG3
Raahi UG3
DebjaniUG2
SaibalUG2
Sayantani UG2
DhaibhatUG2
DeviyankaUG2

Group 3
Aritra Sengupta UG3
Deeptarko UG3
AnanyaUG2
AshavariUG2
Ankita RoyUG2
AbhijitUG2
SohiniUG2

Group 4
Ankita UG3
Arshia UG3
SaptakUG2
AishwaryauG2
Saswati UG2
Sayani UG2

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Solidarity for Owen Holland

At Cambridge, Owen Holland faces a seven-term ban for reading out a poem and disrupting a lecture:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/21/cambridge-university-suspension-poem-owen-holland?newsfeed=true

'Owen Holland has been sentenced to a suspension of seven terms by Cambridge University's court of discipline for reading a poem aloud. He was found guilty in March of "impeding freedom of speech" after a group of students disrupted a lecture by David Willetts, the minister for universities and science, in November last year.
The decision to pursue a peaceful protester is questionable; a sentence of seven terms – more than two years – is absurd. This is not simply a question of internal disciplinary procedures at a single university. This injustice sets a dangerous precedent. We should all be able to conduct reasonable protests against our government without the fear of unjust punishment at the hands of bodies keen to maintain good relations with that government. In this, Holland's case concerns all of us.'

Course matters

Though the course description arranges the history of censorship in a chronological sequence, we will be following a somewhat different trajectory in practice. Every week, half the classes will be devoted to reading the history of censorship as outlined in the schedule. The other half of the week will be devoted to debates about contemporary issues of censorship. These classes will be interactive, and students will be expected to engage in debate, either singly or in groups.

So the first month of the course could look like:


Reading topic: Censorship in Greece and Rome
  • Frederick H. Cramer, ‘Bookburning and Censorship in Ancient Rome’, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 6, no.2 (April 1945), 157-196 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/2707362.pdf]
  • Mary Whitlock Blundell, Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, Vol. 26, No. 3/4, Virtue love & Form: ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF GREGORY VLASTOS (September/December 1993), pp. 17-36 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/40913724.pdf]
Discussion topic: The case of the Ambedkar cartoon
  • Ajay Skaria, 'Violence and Laughter' [ http://kafila.org/2012/05/25/violence-and-laughter-ajay-skaria-on-the-ambedkar-cartoon-controversy/]
  • Round table on the Ambedkar cartoon: [http://roundtableindia.co.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5208%3Aambedkar-cartoon-dalit-objections-and-indian-left-liberals-ii&catid=119%3Afeature&Itemid=132]
There are tons of other material circulating on the Net and social media--these are just two of the recent responses. 


Further course readings:

The Inquisition: 

Elizabethan and Jacobean England
  • Steven Mullaney, The Place of the Stage: License, Play and Power in Renaissance England (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1988)
  • Janet Clare, Art Made Tongue-Tied by Authority (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999)
  • Jos J. Long, 'The Freedom of the Press', Virginia Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 4 (Jan., 1918), pp. 225-246;  http://www.jstor.org/stable/1063583 
  • W.S. Holdsworth, 'Press Control and Copyright in the 16th and 17th Centuries',  The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 8 (Jun., 1920), pp. 841-858;  http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/786947.pdf
England and France in the 17th and 18th Centuries
India during the Raj

  • Robert Darnton, 'Literary Surveillance in the British Raj: The Contradictions of Liberal Imperialism', Book History, Vol. 4 (2001),  http://www.jstor.org/stable/30227330
  • Graham Shaw, 'On the Wrong End of the Raj: some aspects of censorship in British India and its Circumvention 1920s-1940s', Abhijit Gupta and Swapan Chakravorty, eds., Moveable Type: Book History in India (New Delhi: Permanent Black, 2008)
  • James Long, Strike, but Hear! (Calcutta. R.C. Lepage, 1961):  http://books.google.co.in/books/about/Strike_but_hear.html?id=IHAIAAAAQAAJ&redir_esc=y
  • Ranajit Guha, 'Neel- Darpan: the Image of a Peasant Revolt in a Liberal Mirror'Journal of Peasant Studies, 2: 1 (Oct. 1974), 1.46



Tuesday, October 18, 2011

A Call for Papers

This may be of interest to erstwhile students of Censorship (not current students, because it's for Postgrad students and above; the course is not being offered this semester anyway).

The deadline for submission is October 28, 2011.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

About a man who gave his life to disseminate the Word

After reading this and reflecting on our Bruno lectures, I had a dream about Henry Phillips and Giovanni Mocenigo being one and the same person.

Saturday, January 08, 2011

About WikiLeaks and Information Cultures

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that-

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

WikiLeaks, the New Information Cultures and Digital Parrhesia 

 -Shared by Samik Dasgupta

                   UG III

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Mistry

Mumbai University bans Rohinton Mistry's Booker-nominated novel Such a Long Journey from its syllabus, following threats by the Shiv Sena.

Linked here is Mistry's response to what he alludes to as a "sorry spectacle" and here, an article in The Daily Maverick on the incident.

-
Deboleena Rakshit, UG III

Thursday, June 24, 2010

The Obscene Body

"The burgeoning recent work of women in the arts is fueled by three thousand years of fracture-the masculist enforcement of self-righteous institutionalizations that have dogged our heels. My anger, when I first discovered this subtle and pervasive censorship, this excision, paralleled my later rage and confusion at being denied a feminine pronoun (The artist, he . . . Everyone will hand up his hat. Creative man and his images) and upon discovering that my culture denies females an honorable genital. My sexuality was idealized, fetishized, but the organic experience of my own body was referred to as defiling, stinking, contaminating. Bible study and graffiti under the train trestle shared a common deprecation. History, sexuality, and naming were subsumed, contorted. I would have to be "a spy in the house of art."

- From Carolee Schneemann's "The Obscene Body/Politic". It isn't feasible to post the 9-page essay here, but I can forward the .pdf file to anyone interested. Drop in an e-mail or a comment on my blog.